London Olympics committee mulls baby ticket policy

(AP) ? Organizers of the 2012 London Olympics said Tuesday they would consider options for new mothers who want to bring their babies into venues, after some parents complained that they have to buy full price tickets for their infants.

The London Organizing Committee made the statement after complaints flooded the British parenting website Mumsnet, with pregnant women who bought tickets for themselves ? but not for their unborn children ? wondering what they could do with babies who were breast-feeding. They argued that a months-old child would not be taking up a seat of its own.

"Of course we understand that some new mums may want to take their babies to events they have tickets to, and we will look at what we can do when the remaining tickets go on sale in April," the committee said in a statement.

Organizers have said that every child ? including newborns carried in a parent's arms ? must have their own tickets, in part to keep track of the number of visitors so venue capacity is not exceeded. They said special programs exist to make some tickets more affordable to young people, but those discounts did not apply to all events.

London's ticket policy is similar to that of Vancouver, which hosted the 2010 Winter Olympics. Organizers in the Canadian city used discretion at the gate, however, categorizing parents who brought an infant without a ticket as a child care issue. In other words, parents who appeared with children less than a year old ? babes in arms, so to speak ? were not turned away.

Many of the mothers who posted on Mumsnet said they're now in a quandary because they had bought Olympic tickets before they became pregnant, or will have newborns by the time of the games.

One of the mothers, Katherine Baker, told The Associated Press that she was frustrated by the lack of clarity in the official policy regarding infants. Baker, 35, said that she and her husband are keen to attend the swimming heats, to which they were allocated tickets before she became pregnant.

She said she now doesn't know what to do because she will have to breast feed the baby during the event. She said she would not mind paying for a third ticket to let their newborn in ? but it would be nearly impossible to obtain one for the family to all sit together.

"We'll have to apply for one more ticket and compete against thousands of people again," she said.

Another fuming woman wrote that while she and her husband were lucky enough to get tickets to an equestrian event in August, organizers had told her there are no children's tickets so she will have to pay 95 pounds ($147) for a three-month old in a sling.

The latest ticket gaffe is expected to boomerang unhappily on London organizers. Tickets issues of all kinds have dogged the London Olympics as demand for seats at events from July 27-Aug. 12 has far outstripped supply.

Edward Parkinson, United Kingdom director of the ticket resale site Viagogo, said he was somewhat surprised by the organizers' policy that even newborns need tickets.

He compared the Olympics to music festivals, where parents are given concessions for children. In some cases organizers allow children under a certain age to get in for free.

__

Associated Press writer Sylvia Hui contributed to this report.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/cae69a7523db45408eeb2b3a98c0c9c5/Article_2012-01-24-OLY-London-2012-Tickets/id-7e66b18602654592868c3e5a7d0ee550

amy schumer ascii art ascii art andrew mason once in a blue moon gwar guitarist gwar guitarist

BlackBerry Porsche Design P'9981 review

Research in Motion, regardless of how you may view its recent history or its long-term future, still has a stronghold on the corporate world. Its lineup of BlackBerry smartphones are known for great battery life, comfortable keyboards with intuitive shortcuts, top-notch native email and Enterprise clients and -- most important to businesses -- unrivaled security features. Sure, its influence is waning as competitors have caught up in some areas (and surpassed it in others), but there are plenty of companies that have clung to their CrackBerries and held on tight.

RIM's been hard at work trying to regain lost momentum by introducing a series of new devices featuring its latest OS, BlackBerry 7, and the BlackBerry Bold 9900 / 9930 series has been the star of the show so far. The problem is, it's not flashy enough. How is a C-level exec supposed to walk proudly on the golf course with a $300 (subsidized) phone? Talk about embarrassing. Have no fear, poor corporate top dog, luxury brand Porsche Design has come up with a solution: the $2,300 BlackBerry P'9981, a Vertu-ized version of that lesser handset you wouldn't be caught dead using.

The P'9981 is available only in the UK and the Middle East for now, so until the device arrives in the US this Spring, anyone who lives stateside will have to rely on retailers to import some in. Fortunately we got the hookup by our friends at Negri Electronics, who happily lent us one of the few handsets they have in stock. As a result, we're now able to discuss the real questions circling around such a Richie Rich smartphone: what in the blue blazes makes this so expensive? Is it even worth it? How different is it from a standard BlackBerry Bold 9900? You'll find these answers and plenty of mysteries unravelled after the break.

Continue reading BlackBerry Porsche Design P'9981 review

BlackBerry Porsche Design P'9981 review originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:00:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/blackberry-porsche-design-p9981-review/

cma awards cma awards christmas tree tax cmas cmas world series of poker joe walsh

Clever 1-Minute Video Shows How Airplane Wings Really Work [Video]

You probably think that a wing lifts an airplane because the airflow moving over the top has a longer distance to travel and "needs to go faster to have the same transit time as the air travelling along the lower, flat surface." Well, you are wrong. More »


Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/81jrPzzISsc/clever-1+minute-video-shows-how-airplane-wings-really-work

whitney duncan bradley cooper elisabeth hasselbeck roger craig roger craig cadillac xts rambus

Experts: Paterno's death won't stop court cases

FILE - In this Aug. 6, 1999, file photo, Penn State head football coach Joe Paterno, right, poses with his defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky during Penn State Media Day at State College, Pa. In a statement made Sunday, Jan. 22, 2012, retired Penn State assistant coach Sandusky, who faces child sex abuse charges in a case that led to the firing of Paterno, says Paterno's death is a sad day. (AP Photo/Paul Vathis, File)

FILE - In this Aug. 6, 1999, file photo, Penn State head football coach Joe Paterno, right, poses with his defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky during Penn State Media Day at State College, Pa. In a statement made Sunday, Jan. 22, 2012, retired Penn State assistant coach Sandusky, who faces child sex abuse charges in a case that led to the firing of Paterno, says Paterno's death is a sad day. (AP Photo/Paul Vathis, File)

(AP) ? Joe Paterno would no doubt have made a dramatic courtroom witness. But legal experts said his death will have little or no effect on the criminal or civil cases to come out of the Penn State child sex-abuse scandal.

"Obviously, you're taking away a great deal of the high-profile nature of this case, because it deals with Joe Paterno's football program," said Jeffrey Lindy, a criminal defense lawyer involved in a clergy-abuse case in Philadelphia. "But with regard to the legal impact of his death, there is none."

Paterno died Sunday at 85, two months after former coaching assistant Jerry Sandusky was charged with molesting boys and two university officials were accused of perjury and failing to report child sex-abuse allegations against Sandusky to police.

The criminal case against the two university officials may even become more streamlined without Paterno in the mix.

Former university vice president Gary Schultz and athletic director Tim Curley are charged with failing to report to police what graduate assistant Mike McQueary said he told them in 2002: that McQueary saw Sandusky sexually assaulting a boy in a locker room shower.

McQueary first told Paterno, who said he reported it to Curley and Schultz the next day. The administrators told the grand jury they were never informed that the allegations were sexual in nature.

With Paterno's death, though, a jury is free to focus not on what Paterno knew or did, but on the defendants' actions.

What McQueary told Paterno "was a distraction, and now that that part of the case is really gone, it will focus much more on his interaction not with Paterno, but with the Penn State officials," said Duquesne University law professor Nicholas P. Cafardi.

McQueary is also the more crucial witness in the case against Sandusky, who is charged with abusing 10 boys, at least two of them on the Penn State campus.

Paterno testified for just seven minutes last January before the grand jury. He gave only vague answers ? and was never pressed ? when asked what he knew about anyone accusing Sandusky of molesting boys.

"Without getting into any graphic detail, what did Mr. McQueary tell you he had seen and where?" Paterno was asked, according to the grand jury testimony read in court last month.

"Well, he had seen a person, an older ? not an older, but a mature person who was fondling, whatever you might call it ? I'm not sure what the term would be ? a young boy," Paterno replied.

He was asked if he ever heard of any other allegations against Sandusky, who had been the subject of a lengthy campus police investigation four years earlier after a mother complained Sandusky had showered with her young son at the football complex.

"I do not know of anything else that Jerry would be involved in of that nature, no. I do not know of it," Paterno said, adding, "You did mention ? I think you said something about a rumor. It may have been discussed in my presence, something else about somebody. I don't know."

Paterno's grand jury testimony cannot be used in court, because the defense never had the chance to cross-examine him.

"His passing deprives folks from finding out, directly from his lips, exactly what he knew and when he knew it, and what he did or didn't do. But the reality is, sometimes those things can be proved by other means," said Jeff Anderson, the St. Paul, Minn., lawyer who filed the first civil case against Penn State on behalf of a Sandusky accuser.

It's not unusual for a witness to die or become infirm before trial, especially in child sex-abuse cases, which can take years or even decades to surface. In Philadelphia, prosecutors won the right to question 88-year-old retired Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua on video last year to preserve his testimony before the spring trial of three priests and a church official. Bevilacqua suffers from dementia and cancer.

Prosecutors never got the chance to preserve Paterno's testimony, given his surprise cancer diagnosis and rapid decline after they filed the charges Nov. 4.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/347875155d53465d95cec892aeb06419/Article_2012-01-22-Paterno-Legal/id-5bc7bfbf3a914437a49e15cb7bce7219

black friday 2011 deals nfl power rankings week 12 nfl power rankings week 12 brine turkey brine turkey uc davis super committee

5 new reasons to get excited about HDTV

HD Guru

LG's OLED TV will bring the long-promised "organic light emitting diode" technology to the living room this year.

By Geoff Morrison

Now that we?ve had time to recuperate from the Consumer Electronics Show, that international showcase of new technologies, it?s time to take a look at how HDTV will change ? meaningfully???this year.

For the most part, this year?s CES was about bigger, cheaper flat panels, but in the crevasses there was some tech that?s actually worth getting excited about.

OLED
Of course.

LG and Samsung announced OLED, or "organic light emitting diode" televisions. We, and many other media outlets, gave the LG a best-in-show award.

Why are we excited? OLED promises to have a better black level and contrast ratio than plasma (even CRT), while offering lower power consumption and thinner cabinets than LED LCDs. Not only the best of both worlds, but better than both worlds.

No pricing was announced, but rumors have the 55-inch models in the $8,000 to $10,000 range. Before you scoff, it was only a few years ago that 50-inch LED LCDs were near this range. Prices will drop, quality will improve. We can?t wait.

Gesture control/facial recognition
Several companies, including Samsung and LG (see a trend?) announced gesture control, or the ability to adjust your television without the remote. Think of it like a Xbox Kinect, but built into your TV. Wave your hand to increase the volume, etc. With facial recognition, the TV can automatically log you into Skype, or other services. All you have to do is look at your TV.

In some closed-door demonstrations at the show, we got to see this in action. Like any cutting-edge technology, it?s not as seamless as you?d want, but it is undeniably cool.

Will you ditch the remote for hand waving and facial recognition? Probably not this year, but how could this not be the future of product interaction?

ARC (Audio Return Channel)
Released as part of the HDMI 1.4 standard, ARC sends the audio from the TV back up the cable to the receiver and/or soundbar. We?re finally seeing products with this feature built in.

In most cases, a home theater setup would be: source (Blu-ray, cable/satellite) -> receiver or soundbar -> television. This works fine, unless the TV itself is a source. With the prevalence of smart TVs, this is becoming more common. So if you?re watching Netflix through an app on your TV, you either have to run a separate optical cable from the TV to the receiver, or just use the TV speakers.

With ARC, the TV?s audio gets sent back towards the receiver, and then out to your system?s speakers. Both the TV and the receiver/soundbar need to have ARC, and you?ll need an HDMI cable that supports it (most new ones do).

Mobile High-definition Link (MHL)
Roku recently released the Streaming Stick, essentially a miniaturized version of its Internet streaming box that?s the size of a USB flash drive and plugs directly into your TV. While cool, it itself isn?t ?new tech? worthy. But how it works is.

Mobile High-definition Link is a connection technology that uses existing connector types (i.e. HDMI or USB) to transmit 1080p video and 8-channel audio from a device to a TV, and then power from the TV back down to the device. This power can either charge the device (in the case of a mobile phone) or in Roku?s case, power it completely.

The odd thing about the Roku is that the TV has to have the MHL technology, meaning it has to be a new TV. Most new TVs already have streaming services built in. Regardless, it?s a cool idea that I?m sure many companies will developing products for.

Speech recognition
While OLED got all the fanfare at CES this year, it was speech recognition that was seemingly everywhere. Whether it was standalone products, or built into TVs, talking to your products seems to be coming in a big way. You can thank the hype around Apple?s Siri for that.

The reason so many of these products are coming out now, and working, is largely due to one company: Nuance. Thanks to years of research and extensive studying of human speech patterns, Nuance allows devices to understanding what?s being said. No small feat, that.

Samsung and LG both have speech recognition built into many of their 2012 models. Commands like ?Volume up? and ?Power off? make the interaction with your TV more fluid, and entirely sci-fi.

Like any new technology (and the gesture/face control mentioned above), it?s not quite as fast or fool-proof as you?d hope. Still, the idea of being able to walk into your TV room, say ?TV on, channel 4,? and have the TV magically come to life is any sci-fi nerd?s dream. The tech isn?t quite there yet to do this perfectly, but it?s getting there.

Contact Geoff Morrison on Twitter at?@TechWriterGeoff, and check out?Geoff?s book. Questions for HD Guru? Send an?email.

Source: http://gadgetbox.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/23/10217044-5-new-reasons-to-get-excited-about-hdtv

green bay packers lana del rey saturday night live focus on the family packers vs giants giants score aaron rodgers 2012 golden globe nominations

GOP race turns to new terrain in Florida (AP)

TAMPA, Fla. ? Florida voters are facing a new political reality as the Republican presidential contest turns their way.

Newt Gingrich's stunning victory in South Carolina on Saturday stopped Mitt Romney's march to his party's presidential nomination. And Florida now becomes a critical test for whether the former Massachusetts governor can regroup and rediscover his dominance in the race to face President Barack Obama in November.

The four remaining candidates will be in the state Monday for the first of two presidential debates this week. They have just nine days to navigate an electorate unlike anything they've faced so far. The state is six times larger than New Hampshire, has almost five times more Hispanics than Iowa, and has a population that's older and more culturally moderate than South Carolina's.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/politics/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20120122/ap_on_el_pr/us_gop_campaign_florida_s_turn

wvu football district 9 district 9 pandaria pandaria artie lange baby lisa irwin

Obama Kills the Pipeline and Stalls America (ContributorNetwork)

COMMENTARY | Not only Republicans are outraged over Obama's decision to once more, stall the XL Pipeline, unions are too. Yet, undeterred by the pleas of job-hungry Americans the Obama administration has said no. Citing concerns for the environment, the president has once more placed his political agenda over the needs of our country.

Let's face it, America runs on oil. We all like the idea of getting away from dependence on fossil fuels, but we are not there yet. Society is not ready to give up everything it has and embrace the Chevy Volt. Even if we were, the need for oil still exists. There are factories, power companies, military needs and an entire nation of people that depend on the black gold. For the near future, America will rely on oil. It makes good sense to get it from a friendly neighbor instead of depending on oil from volatile nations.

America needs jobs. It has been reported the pipeline would bring 20,000 new jobs to the U.S. Obama's decision to stall the project has directly caused thousands of Americans to suffer. Logic and common sense clearly dictates the positive effects the pipeline would bring. Putting people to work, less dependence on oil from the middle east, a more substantial tax base, just to name a few.

Canada took considerable steps to ensure the environmental sanctity of the areas the pipeline would run through. Our northern neighbor has bent over backwards in its attempts to satisfy the needs of everyone involved. With Obama's rejection of the pipeline, Canada will probably sell the oil to China. That would insure our continued dependence on Middle East oil, and that would be ironic and foolish.

President Obama has thrown opportunity for our country out the window in favor of his own selfish ideals. It is unconscionable to forsake the needs of the many to pursue one's own desire, but this is exactly what Obama has done. His mind is living in a fantasy world of green that cannot be accomplished, and he does not care. He has abandoned his oath of office, and ignored the pleas of the entire nation in hopes that it all will somehow be OK.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/obama/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20120120/bs_ac/10861125_obama_kills_the_pipeline_and_stalls_america

jon bon jovi dead new jersey plane crash ohio state kobe bryant wife bonjovi dead amber portwood sam shepard

?If You Take Daddy?s Wedding Ring, We May Not Be Married Anymore?

My daughter has this obsession with taking shiny things and hiding them.? Specifically, my husband?s wedding band.? The good news is that we obviously have child-proofed drawers, so I hide most of my jewelry and make up in them or else Sunny would look like a crazy bejeweled gypsy with makeup on every day.

She likes to find shiny things and put them in hiding places all over the house but then never remembers where she put them. It?s like asking Rose from Titanic where the diamond is.

It?s really frustrating because she?s 4 ?, so it shouldn?t be hard for her to remember where she?s hidden these treasures. She?ll hide my husband?s wedding band because for some reason, she thinks its absolutely hilarious and then we?ll ask, ?Where is it? Where?s the ring?? and she?ll get this look of confusion on her face. You can tell she?s slowly recalling the act of taking it but then she looks a little upset and you can tell she?s completely forgotten where she?s hidden it.

So she starts coming up with fake answers. ?I put it in a drawer.? ?Which drawer?? ?At Grandmas house.? ?Oh okay, can we call her?? ?No? It?s actually not at her house, it?s in my room.?

So we start looking, but after searching for, like, 10 minutes she?ll say, ?No, no, actually it?s in my room in Santa Barbara, I promise.? Sunny hasn?t been to Santa Barbara in a month and she took the ring this morning, but she swears it?s there. It?s like asking my grandfather what he had for breakfast on his tenth birthday.

My housekeeper thinks I?m weird because I have asked her, like, five times to find my husband?s wedding band. She?s probably thinking,?Take a hint. lady.?

?

?

Julia Obst has never written anything but has ?always wanted to be a contributor to Vanity Fair because she ?has always thought that Vanity Fair contributors look very cool. But, she's also a mom of two cute girls, an event planner and married. So there's that. You can read her blog here, or follow her on Twitter here!
See more posts from Julia

Source: http://hellogiggles.com/%E2%80%9Cif-you-take-daddy%E2%80%99s-wedding-ring-we-may-not-be-married-anymore%E2%80%9D?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=%25e2%2580%259cif-you-take-daddy%25e2%2580%2599s-wedding-ring-we-may-not-be-married-anymore%25

diana nyad diana nyad vikings bears packers michael vick kenny britt matt hughes